Tuesday, October 26, 2010 - 9:05 PM
The latest Transparency International report on perceptions of corruption is out, and Russia doesn't fare well.
The country has dropped to 158th place (out of 178), and now shares a score of 2.1 with Cameroon and Tajikistan. It’s also the most corrupt of the Brics.....India came in at 116th, with a score of 3.4, while China ranked 78th at 3.5, and Brazil ranked 69th with a score of 3.7.
For a term coined by an investment bank almost a decade ago, the BRIC label has been remarkably durable. And at certain moments, the BRIC countries themselves have embraced a group identity, even holding summits the last two years. But the latest report raises the question of whether B, I, and C may not wish to be so closely associated with R in the future. After all, China's economic performance dwarfs Russia's. And Brazil and India are justifiably proud that they've managed to pair strong economic growth with vibrant democracy. If they do conclude that they're better off without being constantly linked to Russia, however, they'll have to figure out how to extricate themselves from a grouping they didn't create in the first place.
No offense is intended but in your line on democracy I think you mean "Brazil and India" and not "Brazil and China"*.
*Though I'm not entirely certainly I would call India's a "vibrant" democracy so much as simply a "democracy".
National interests will crack BRIC, not 'corruption index'
David Bosco is reading too much in the tea leaves of ‘corruption index’.
The crack in the BRIC will come NOT because of corruption index but because of national interests.
Brazil, Russia, India and China have divergent national interests. Russia and India want to contain rising China whereas Brazil does NOT care much about the rivalry between the three. So Brazil will side with its Western partners in the contest between those three.
However US is trying to promote India to counter rising China but EU is staying neutral in rivalry between the three of BRIC’s four. So split in Western partners will lead Brazil to side with China since China is much more economically powerful than India or Russia.
Personally I agree that national interests will probably have more of an impact than a report but I imagine that the other three will feel less and less need to think of Russia if Russia can't reverse its problems. However I can't really see why Brazil would need to explicitly ally with China. Brazil doesn't have a long history in the region and probably would rather be on good terms with every big economy it can.
(4)
HIDE COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE